Student Paper Evaluation Form

___________________________ Name of Presenter		Consider for Pi Mu Epsilon prize
___________________________ Institution		Consider for SIAM prize
___________________________ Length of Talk		Consider for AWM prize

To the Evaluator: Please evaluate the student paper on each of the criteria below using the following scale. Turn in your evaluation to the moderator by the end of the session.

5 Exemplary (one of the best student papers I have ever heard)

4 Excellent (strong candidate for an award; comparable to past award winners)

3 Good (possible candidate for an award)

2 Adequate (probably not a candidate for an award)

1 Not recommended for an award

A________   Topic and Level [appropriateness for anticipated audience]

B________   Organization/Preparation [structure; depth and breadth of allotted time]

C________   Presentation [diction; clarity; pace; enthusiasm; rapport with audience]

D________   Understanding [command of subject; responsiveness to questions]

E________   Use of visual aids and/or chalkboard [readability; complementarity with                  oral presentation]

F________   Exposition: [general interest in subject; integration of ideas; scope]

                 Or Research: [quality; originality in content and/or approach]

  ________   Total Score

Please put constructive critcism to student on back of page and it will be shared with the student. Remarks on the front of the page will remain confidential.

Remarks to consider in judging: